Canon image quality/rendering
You can get them to look close, but there are small things that don't match up, Canon has very different kind of noise from Nikon for example, I find Canon noise pleasant whereas Nikon noise leaves me cold. Probably not a big deal (or even noteworthy) from some, just something I pay attention to in addition to all the other things.
You're right, and I would have gone Nikon if I wasn't also interested in the video capabilities of Canon. We each make our own compromises I don't mind adapters, but I use native mount whenever I can, and native lenses whenever they're better than third party lenses. There are some great Canon lenses, but the truth is some third party lenses can beat some Canon lenses but L and non. But I agree, it's all about the lenses, the other stuff is secondary. Lenses are the thing that affects image rendering the most, the first step. Everything the camera does is just manipulate the light that came through the lens, it's the lens that shapes it in the first place.
My adapter comment was aimed at Canon respondents in general who would be tempted to offer the adapter argument.
Rick Knepper, photographer, shooting for pleasure. Just say NO! to MAIL-IN REBATES.
D800E + Zeiss 18mm f3.5 ZF link to RAW Download
D800E + Zeiss 25mm f2.8 ZF link to RAW Download
D800E + Zeiss 28mm f2 ZF link to RAW Download
D800E + Zeiss 35mm f2 ZF link to RAW Download
D800E + Zeiss 50mm f2 Makro ZF link to RAW Download
5D3 vs. 6D with 24-70 II f8 & f11 link to RAW Download
5D3 vs. 6D with 24-70 II Landscape link to RAW Download
6D + 40mm f2.8 STM landscape link to RAW Download
5D3 & 24-70 II versus D800E & 24-70G link to RAW Download
5D3 & 24-70 II @28mm VS. 5D3 & Zeiss ZF 28mm link to RAW Download