Is your photography better with FF?

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
Teru Kage
Contributing MemberPosts: 604Gear list
Like?
Not better, just more DOF
In reply to kelvin2345, 9 months ago

kelvin2345 wrote:

I have been seeing a lot of "Should I move to FF?", "difference between f4 and f2.8 lens", "New DF coming" kind of posts in the past month. I really wonder whether the photos taken by those people have improved after spending all those money in new gears and gadgets.

There's not much reason why anyone's photography would improve simply from moving to a larger sensor (i.e. APS-C to FF). It may open more options, but skill-wise, a FF shouldn't change much. To me, the main difference when I upgraded to FF a few years back was the shallower DOF. The better ISO performance was a nice bonus, but to me it was the ability to play with shallower DOF that was the real appeal.

-- hide signature --

Photography - It's not what you look at that matters; it's what you see.
Galleries: http://www.photo.net/photos/teru
http://www.fotop.net/teruphoto

 Teru Kage's gear list:Teru Kage's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 Nikon D700 Olympus PEN E-PL1 Olympus PEN E-PL5 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR +17 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
NoNew
yesNew
NoNew
YesNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow