100 f2 vs 100mm 2.8 IS Macro for a telephoto lens

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
bdjansen
Forum MemberPosts: 64
Like?
100 f2 vs 100mm 2.8 IS Macro for a telephoto lens
7 months ago

I've been planning on getting the 100mm f2 as a fast telephoto. But I will be getting a bit more money then I thought from some things and I could buy a 100mm f2.8 IS Macro if I wanted.

Should I think about getting the Macro instead to use as a telephoto? I need the lens for event photography, not macro. But I might start playing with more macro photography if I have that lens too. What if I got the 100 f2 and added an extender for macro?

Advantages of the Macro:

Can do macro.

IS

"L" lens quality, whatever that means.

Advantages of the 100 f2

Stop faster.

Cheaper.

Lighter.

Sharper according to DXO (I'm sure they are both sufficiently sharp).

ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow