Is the D610 a Significant Upgrade Over a D700?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
Alan Brown
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,637Gear list
Like?
no presents this morning then?
In reply to wisep01, 7 months ago

wisep01 wrote:

You'd think the duffers at Nikon would have anticipated that the large RAW file size would serve as a deterrent to prospective buyers and come out with a micro-RAW capability that Canon has. But, nooo. That would be expecting too much of them.

If you enjoy staring at AF points clustered like a Tampax sanitary pad, go for the D610. With the exception of its sensor, it's a watered-down camera with a watered-down price that befits watered-down expectations.

My advice if you anticipate trying out one: prepare yourself to be disappointed in advance and prepare well; then when you actually handle the D6xx series, you just might manage to handle it long enough to keep your food down. No guarantees, though.

something has made you very cynical this morning....

never seen so much hyperbole in so few paragraphs! (keep your food down is a little extreme don't you think?~)

hope your day improves.

-- hide signature --

There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness.' :'!':

 Alan Brown's gear list:Alan Brown's gear list
Nikon D7000 Nikon 1 J2 Nikon D600 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG Macro +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
YESNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow