PIX 2015

Pentax lenses on par with canon L and nikon pro lenses?

Started Dec 23, 2013 | Questions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Azzy
Regular MemberPosts: 277
Like?
Re: Nope
In reply to Jim in Hudson, Dec 24, 2013

Jim in Hudson wrote:

Azzy wrote:

- Fair comparison with Canon's, though Pentax should be a tad cheaper considering we have the SR in body

Of course Pentax has some decently priced gems as well but since the lens does not have built in IS/VR/SR/OS they should not charge extra premium just because it's competitors are. That makes having IBSR advantage a moot point

-- hide signature --

My website and portfolio: http://luwindo.com/

This would be a valid point if Pentax charged more, relative to Canon and Nikon, for DSLR bodies because they include IBIS... but they don't charge more.

The difference isn't that large, i.e 7D is ~$200 difference from K-3 and D7100 is a tad cheaper. Yes they are older bodies but that's the current competition for K-3 right now.

As you buy more lenses then the cost saving advantage of having IBIS goes even smaller, the public perception would be why bother getting a "less known brand" with IBIS when they're selling exact same lenses but without VR/IS/VC/OS and charge the same amount/even more.

Especially when Canikon/Sigma are slapping IS on almost everything they're releasing now including cheapo consumer zoom lenses

-- hide signature --

My website and portfolio: http://luwindo.com/

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
NopeNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow