Best Value DSLR - Sony A58

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
123Mike
Senior MemberPosts: 4,221Gear list
Like?
Re: Best Value DSLR - Sony A58
In reply to havoc315, 9 months ago

Higher resolution sensor. (24 vs 20)

That's like what, 500 pixels wider from like 5500 pixels wide. Not significant at all.

The question was "best" --- You may not personally feel that 24 is significantly better than 20.

Most people will likely find that 24 is not significantly better than 20. Many also realize that more is not necessarily better.

About 1/2 stop better noise performance.

When I'm doing comparisons using the online comparisons, I'm not seeing this. I'm looking side by side 3200 ISO raws and I'm not seeing less noise on the Nikon over the Sony.

OK, your eyes aren't seeing it. Every professional reviewer sees it. The DXOMark scores aren't even close.

Certainly, you can't credibly say that the Sony is better than the Nikon.

Looking at is side by side does not show any serious differences.

Larger, higher resolution LCD.

Better overall IQ.

I have not seen any evidence to support that claim.

No evidence? Really?

DXOMark score of 81 vs 74. Other than your own subjective opinion, do you have any evidence that Sony A58 has better IQ than the Nikon D3200?

I don't think that that score difference means that people should expect their pictures to look 9% better, whatever that would even mean.

In terms of continuous shooting performance: At full resolution, the A58 can only shoot about 5fps, and only for about 6 RAW frames total. The Nikon D3200 can shoot 4fps, but for 12 RAW frames. I'd rather have a 3-second burst of 12 frames, than a 1.2 second burst of 6 frames.

I'll just stick with my A57. It burst nice and fast and long.

Yup, love the A57. But that has nothing to do with this.

The few advantages I can see in the A58: Better live view (as is always the case when comparing dSLT to dSLR), and the A58 has a tiltable LCD.

Plus proper camcorder like auto focusing during video, making the Sony the no-brainer choice for the average family.

But if I was spending $500 on a new dSLR, I would be hard-pressed to say that the A58 is a better camera than the Nikon D3200.

Others say the Sony is the better choice.

So really, the argument that the A58 is the best value dSLR, comes down to basically one thing -- camcorder-like-video? So by that logic, the Sony should be the best choice at all levels. Best mid-level, best prosumer, etc, etc.

For families that are interested in making a casual video here and there to capture the atmosphere, in that consumer prices range, the Sony looks like a better choice.

As I said, the A58 may be a perfectly decent camera. But the only reason anybody rational would call it the "best" would be if they limited the review to solely cameras introduced in 2013, based on msrp... Without looking at real world pricing and current availability.

The Sony provides a better bang for your buck.

I'd be hard pressed to recommend the A58 to anybody over the D3200, unless they are shooting lots of video. But for someone primarily concerned with still photography, it would be very very hard for me to recommend the A58.

Even without video, I'd opt for the A58. Live view pdaf, flip out screen, 400 lenses with decent low cost ones going back to the 80s which means that Nikon does not give the Sony a crushing blow for lenses.

But anyway, would you not be more at home in a Nikon forum? Imagine if I start pitting up Sony against Nikon in a Nikon forum. See how much aggressive prejudice I would have to endure.

 123Mike's gear list:123Mike's gear list
Sony a6000 Sony E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS A3000 Sony E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Sony DT 35mm F1.8 SAM +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow