Body size vs Sensor size, are we overpaying mobility?

Started Nov 16, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Contributing MemberPosts: 507Gear list
Body size vs Sensor size, are we overpaying mobility?
Nov 16, 2013

I`m a mere beginner in the world of digital cameras, so please feel free to correct me if/where you find needed.

That said, while I`m waiting for my local store to get Canon PowerShot S120 in their stock (399€), I noticed Canon EOS 1100D (Rebel T3) 18-55 IS II kit for 370€. Now, that made me thinking - S120 has a 1/1.7" size sensor, while 1100D has an APS-C size sensor (almost 8x the size of S120`s one).

With all due respect to S120 being a new (and maybe currently heavily overpriced) camera, and putting aside many improvements and features that it brings simply because of being more up-to-date, and being aware of the fact that "more advanced" technology is needed to produce smaller parts, I`m curious - are we still (by far) overpaying a "luxury" of having a "pocketable" camera (which can be carried around without a hassle)?

I understand that these two cameras fall into completely different categories and areas of interest/usage, and thus they have some major differences, but I`m interested in this from a more theoretic aspect, or from a practical one in terms of production cost / end-user price.

Are today`s high-end compacts (like Canon S120) more restricted by the current technology (or the price to invent one), or maybe by sole (money-driven) decisions of companies that make them, delaying the progress as much as possible in order to drain money for a longer period without actually doing much work for it? Are compact cameras sensor-crippled on purpose, not to compete with DSLR market? What do you think?

I do realize that, in the end, it`s the money that makes the world go round, but it sometimes makes me a bit sad to see how it influences (slows down to a crawl) technology evolution... Competition is a key factor here, but only if there are (were) no deals between the companies, having everyone producing the best they can. Sweet dreams, I guess.

Looking at Sony RX100 II with its 1" sensor (still small in comparison to mentioned APS-C one, but almost 3x times bigger than 1/1.7" sensor) and the effect it has on the image quality, I`m really eager to see what will the next iteration(s) of Canon S series compacts bring... and when.

I know that there are by far more factors that make a good image quality than sensor size alone (lens, processor, etc.), but for this topic I would like to hear opinions on the sensor size only (or mostly, at least) - do you also have a feeling that we are more and more getting crumbs from what could have otherwise been a pretty nice loaf?

p.s. If I missed the correct forum to post this, please move as appropriate.

 boogisha's gear list:boogisha's gear list
Canon PowerShot A75 Canon ELPH 300 HS Canon PowerShot S120 Canon PowerShot G7 X
Canon EOS 1100D (EOS Rebel T3 / EOS Kiss X50) Canon PowerShot S120 Sony RX100 II
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow