Why Pentax Need a New Mount Now

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
paulkienitz
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,776Gear list
Like?
Re: Or Ricoh mount?
In reply to 6x9, 9 months ago

6x9 wrote:

Personally, I do not buy the inerchangeable sensors concept of Ricoh. This "mount" adds to bulkiness of the camera. Also technology is going fast. In 2-3 years the "body" and the lenses with integrated sensors will become outdated. Instead of upgrading a body only (in case of "nornal" cameras), one would end up in upgrading both the body and lenses.

I still think a sensor attached to the lens is The Future.  We're not that far from the day when each year's sensors are much the same as those of a few years before.  And you can still make it so the back end with the sensor is replaceable with simple tools on a clean workbench, but sealed when out in the field.

It would be extra excellent if there was a standard sensor-to-body connector that lots of companies shared.  One that could work either by direct attachment or over a cable.  The sensor-to-lens attachment can be totally proprietary.

-- hide signature --

"A good photograph is knowing where to stand." -- Ansel

 paulkienitz's gear list:paulkienitz's gear list
Pentax Q Pentax K-3 Pentax smc DA 55-300mm F4.0-5.8 ED Pentax smc DA* 300mm F4.0 ED (IF) SDM Samyang 8mm F3.5 Aspherical IF MC Fisheye +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow