D610 vs. 5D Mark III

Started 8 months ago | Discussions thread
Mikael Risedal
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,022
Like?
Re: If this were true Re: D610 vs. 5D Mark III
In reply to Daniel Lee Taylor, 8 months ago

Daniel Lee Taylor wrote:

Mikael Risedal wrote:

IR doesn't use the same time when they compare cameras and iso, often Canon are 2/3 stop more exposed in comparison example 1/740 sec compared to 1/1250 sec and Nikon

This is not true. IR precisely controls lighting and exposure in the Dave Box test. And I see the same differences (about 1 stop in JPEG; negligible with slight edge to 5D3) both there and here.

Nikons CFA is better than Canon which shows in DXO measurements

DxO is a joke, and you will convince me of nothing by quoting them. I will not rely on a site that makes such gross errors as rating a crop DSLR higher then a medium format back, or claiming >14 stops of DR from a linear 14-bit ADC.

Color differences are negligible in tests with equal lighting and WB. I don't buy the color claims from either direction.

Now colors are rather subjective and I can get Canon and Nikon to look very similar but the facts are Nikon has better color depth than Canon

I see no evidence of this "fact."

well , easiest for you are to compare by your self from IR, take a Canon camera and a Nikon camera and look at iso, f-stop and time

That DXO is a joke shows your own ignorance. There are measurements of FWC and read out noise dr declared and you have figures here http://www.sensorgen.info.

Here is 1600iso and IR. se anything strange regarding exposure time ? 1dx and d4

-- hide signature --

Member of Swedish Photographers Association since 1984
Canon, Hasselblad, Leica,Nikon, Linhoff, Sinar
Member of International anti-banding and read out noise Association

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow