How good is 24meg realy ?

Started 8 months ago | Discussions thread
MightyMike
Forum ProPosts: 30,230
Like?
Re: How good is 24 meg realy ?
In reply to Donald B, 8 months ago

Donald B wrote:

MightyMike wrote:

Donald B wrote:

everyone has eyes, don't need a sales site to tell me the difference in photo quality, even my 75 yo mother can see the difference , and can only see out of one eye.

cheers don

-- hide signature --

Pentax K7, Panasonic fz150, Olympus XZ1, my main toys.

The eyes can't be trusted when the photos are pre-manipulated. Basically what I'm saying is there is absolutely no controls in your experiment to make any result out of it valid. A great photographer can do a good just with perceived inferior equipment and a idiot can ruin a perfectly good photo with poor editing skills. Random photos, random setting, random situations, random people, random skill sets, random editing which amounts to with no controls are a useless way to evaluate a cameras capabilities. You won't find me judging a camera by any photo results but my own, therefore when i judge a camera its by the numbers, the specifications, its on a technical level not the subjective and totally blind way of looking at random photos.

Unless a visual test/example is done with absolute precision and total controls then it can be skewed in dozens of ways making it propaganda and not truth.

-- hide signature --

Mike from Canada
"I am not a great photographer! God is a great creator! All I do is capture His creation with the tools He has provided me."
'I like to think so far outside the box that it would require a telephoto lens just to see the box!' ~ 'My Quote :)'
http://www.michaelfastphotography.com/galleries/VP-BDI_3a.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?sort_order=views%20DESC&first_this_page=0&page_limit=180&&emailsearch=mighty_mike88%40hotmail.com&thumbnails=

sorry Mike but couldn't hold off any longer, now explain how my test were not correct ?

-- hide signature --

Pentax K7, Panasonic fz150, Olympus XZ1, my main toys.

I see 2 photos, no idea of setting but they definitely look like you tried however. I assume the right one is the K-7 and what i see is the look of false detail in the form of luminance noise... as for actual detail not much difference just more pixels per area of detail on the left side... the lighting sure looks different and the processing, you're certainly getting different colours and saturation.

-- hide signature --

Mike from Canada
"I am not a great photographer! God is a great creator! All I do is capture His creation with the tools He has provided me."
'I like to think so far outside the box that it would require a telephoto lens just to see the box!' ~ 'My Quote :)'
http://www.michaelfastphotography.com/galleries/VP-BDI_3a.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?sort_order=views%20DESC&first_this_page=0&page_limit=180&&emailsearch=mighty_mike88%40hotmail.com&thumbnails=

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow