Why no m4/3 tele converters like Nikon/Canon others?

Started Nov 10, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Dr_Jon
Dr_Jon Senior Member • Posts: 2,780
Re: Why no m4/3 tele converters like Nikon/Canon others?

Really the only current lens that would benefit from one is the 35-100 f2.8, however it isn't that sharp wide-open (it's okay, just not stellar, and you need a good starting point). Hence with the loss of sharpness of an extender really all you could have is a 1.4x shot at f4/f5.6 giving f5.6/f8. Should be okay in good light I guess. I'd rather have a 250mm f3.2 though...

 Dr_Jon's gear list:Dr_Jon's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 Sony RX100 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM +23 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ayt
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow