Why no m4/3 tele converters like Nikon/Canon others?

Started Nov 10, 2013 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Contributing MemberPosts: 556
Why no m4/3 tele converters like Nikon/Canon others?
Nov 10, 2013

Is there a technical reason why there are no tele converters for m4/3 shooters?

The longest lens we have with AF is 300mm which equates to 600mm or so, limiting our ability to shoot long distances. Everything from sports to wildlife is hampered on the m4/3 platform due to this equipment omission.

I'd like a 1.4x and 2x TC just as the other shooters have available, despite the probable slight loss of light.

300mm is not often long enough for me using m4/3 cameras and I'm thinking of selling everything off as it's just too limiting not having the ability to shoot longer distances as other shooters can.

-- hide signature --

Also, why hasn't anyone made a lens with AF that surpasses 300mm......I'd love a 50-500 lens as Sigma produces but native to m4/3.

I think if the m4/3 consortium wishes serious photogs to consider migrating over to the m4/3 platform we need to have everything at our disposal as traditional photographers have currently.

(I know some professionals have made the switch to m4/3 and I applaud their efforts, but sporters and naturalists need longer glass!)


Steve Nunez~South Florida Artist
Oly EM5-OMD, Panasonic GH-3, G2, GF3, G5
Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow