I think the notion of FF = heavier lens may not be true

Started Nov 8, 2013 | Discussions thread
shigzeo
Senior MemberPosts: 1,347Gear list
Like?
Re: I think the notion of FF = heavier lens may not be true
In reply to AlbertInFrance, Nov 8, 2013

AlbertInFrance wrote:

I do know that the smallest lens I own is my 50mm f:1.8 Nikkor AIS. Same diameter but a touch shorter than my Fuji 18mm f:2.

Of course, the adapter for X-mount makes the Nikkor a bit longer than the Fuji 35mm, but nothing like the size of the Fuji 56mm, judging from the pictures Fuji have already put out.

-- hide signature --

Albert
Every photograph is an abstraction from reality.
Most people are more interested in the picture than the image.

The smallest lens I have is the Canon 35/2 LTM, which weighs less than 170g, all metal, 35mm image circle. It is tiny. The 50/1,8 AiS lens dwarfs it completely. If you want small, compact and built for a life time, pick up LTM and M lenses from a few years ago. Modern Leica lenses are almost the size of modern SLR screw-mount AF lenses, though typically still much smaller than SLR AFS lenses.

Fuji's lenses are massive and still only APSC.

 shigzeo's gear list:shigzeo's gear list
Nikon D200 Fujifilm X-Pro1 Nikon D800 Sony Alpha 7R Fujifilm X-T1 +6 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow