Part II: Nikon wasting time & resources on a BS retro camera

Started 11 months ago | Discussions thread
Kerry Pierce
Forum ProPosts: 17,252Gear list
Like?
Re: Your post illustrates the d400/et all problem very well.
In reply to Stacey_K, 10 months ago

Stacey_K wrote:

Kerry Pierce wrote:

If they don't continue to offer TOL DX cameras with pro features like the d300, then there is no reason to bother with pro level DX lenses.

That's what I said They haven't bothered with them.

But, you haven't made the case that more pro level DX lenses are necessary to ensure the future viability of a pro level DX camera system.

I am certainly not saying that Nikon shouldn't make pro DX glass, because I don't believe that to be the right thing to do.  Indeed, I've often called for f/2 pro level DX lenses in the past. But, I don't think that the lack of more pro level DX lenses hurts the pro level DX cameras at all.

Kerry

-- hide signature --

my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/root

 Kerry Pierce's gear list:Kerry Pierce's gear list
Nikon D300 Nikon D700 Nikon D3S Nikon D7000 Nikon D5100 +11 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
D610New
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow