Part II: Nikon wasting time & resources on a BS retro camera

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
Shaun_Nyc
Senior MemberPosts: 2,250Gear list
Like?
Re: D610
In reply to DezM, 6 months ago

DezM wrote:

I think the D610 is an awesome camera. I haven't tried it but tried the D600, the same. The only reason I haven't yet moved to FF was that the D600 had the much commented debris issue (many samples produced a lot of debris that looked like peeling from shutter). And the D800 is a bit on the expensive side and hard to justify for me.

Re questions on use of D610, I think you could pay a visit and ask that question in the FF forum, people will be able to help.

Re Iq, it's hard to beat, and the base ISO DR and color gradation, as well as the ability to recover detail/color in shadows is state of the art. If you get one, I'm looking forward to see your NY images, as always.

Best wishes, Renato.

-- hide signature --

Renato.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rhlpedrosa/
OnExposure member
http://www.onexposure.net/
Good shooting and good luck
(after Ed Murrow)

Exactly my thoughts Renato. Quality control on both FF models was questionable. Hopefully, Nikon has learned it's lesson and is taking it's time with the D300 successor to make sure it gets it right with minimal issues.
--
Dez

Only thing I can think of is Nikon doesn’t have (yet) the desired spec aps-c sensor to offer for a D400. It has to outperform the 24mp in the 7100. And who is going fab it , toshiba sony ? It doesn’t take this long to design the body.

 Shaun_Nyc's gear list:Shaun_Nyc's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Nikon D50 Nikon D3 Nikon D800 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR +10 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
D610New
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow