Sony RX10 is interesting for m4/3 users Locked

Started Oct 17, 2013 | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
marike6
Senior MemberPosts: 5,070Gear list
Re: And it will face the same Questions......
In reply to Dheorl, Oct 19, 2013

Dheorl wrote:

marike6 wrote:

dougjgreen1 wrote:

Sean Nelson wrote:

marike6 wrote:

I have no problem with the Sony RX10 (other than the price which seems high for a bridge camera). The point is was trying to make is: why should an almost 2 lb camera (heavier than virtually every APS-C / m43 mirrorless, and most mid-range DSLRs) be of interest to m43 users?

It's because this camera has just opened up a new point on the sensor size / capability spectrum, and that point is directly adjacent to M43. Before the 1" sensor cameras were introduced, there was a huge gap between M43 and "compact" cameras. Now the 1" sensors provide a new choice for those who don't quite need the capabilities of the M43 system but who aren't satisfied with small-sensor compacts.

Just as M43 users have decided they don't need FF or APS-C capabilities, some of the people who choose the RX10 will do so because they decide they don't need M43 capabilities. And of all the 1" sensor cameras out there, this one has the greatest focal length range while having a lens fast enough to distinguish it from its smaller-sensored compatriots - and it has a lot of features such as (presumably) good video, weather sealing, etc. which may have attracted people to M43. Yes it's large and heavy, but not really any more so than carrying around an M43 body and two zoom lenses or even an M43 body and the 14-140.

Like it or not, for a certain slice of the market this is an M43 competitor. I've been waiting for the right M43 camera to show up for quite a long time, and I'm now considering the RX10 instead. I can't be the only one out there thinking this way.

For a smaller sensor, and the IQ sacrifice that entails (admittedly minor) why isn't it smaller? This camera is bigger than just about ANY M43 camera other than the GH3.\

It's bigger, it's heavier and more expensive than even almost ALL m43 cameras w/ kits.

And almost all m43 cameras with kits have less range and over most of that range less control over DoF.

But very few if any serious m43 photographers stick with the kit lenses but opt for the optically better, and more interesting large aperture primes like the 12 f/2, 20 f/1.7, 25 f/1.4, 45 f/1.8, not to mention the few large aperture zooms.

I have no problem with 1", I've owned both the RX100 and Nikon V1, both excellent cameras. But the RX100 is great for scenics, not selective focus type images. The Nikon V1 absolutely need fast, large aperture lenses to be interesting. Otherwise DOF is hideously deep.

If you can't make interesting images without resorting to gimmicks such as shallow DoF I think that says more about you than it does the cameras you use.

Shallow DOF is not a gimmick. Selective focus something that distinguishes large sensor cameras from bland smart phone and compact snap shots. But yes if you just want to record some scenics or family events and don't care about DOF control, by all means don't shoot m43, APS-C or FF.

So no 1" cameras are NOT a strict 1 to 1 competitor with m43. I find it hard to believe that m43 users think so little of their chosen format to think camera with a small 1" sensor camera replace it for a little bridge camera convenience.

I thought the point of m43 was SMALL with DLSR IQ. DSLR quality not just based on a DxOMark sensor rating number, or an arbitrary DR or color depth number, but true shallow DOF, selective focus type images that only larger sensor with fast max aperture lenses cameras are capable of.

The point of m43 is to have another point on the scale of IQ vs size and convenience, the RX10 just adds another point on this scale.

The RX10 is as large, heavy and expensive as most DSLRs. Not sure what point it adds on any scale or how it relates to m43 at all. m43 is about small size, low weight cameras with DSLR level IQ in all kinds of natural light situations.

Sorry, but a 24-200 f8 DOF equivalent camera sounds OK. But tell me it's the same price as a Fujifilm X-E2 / 18-55 f/2.8-4 kit, or D7100 kit and I'll try not to laugh, I promise.

Is DoF really all you think about? It has so much going for it over either of those cameras that I think the price is justified.

No DOF is not everything nor is price. But I have no interest in a $1400 Sony bridge camera that's less versatile, has worse IQ, and cannot mount any lenses below 24mm or above 200mm.  But photography is a very personal thing, and everybody has different needs. If you want the camera, buy it.  I see little need for m43 users to be interested in such a camera when a EM-5, GH3 or EM-1 will provide better IQ, and access to a ton of primes and zooms.

 marike6's gear list:marike6's gear list
Nikon Coolpix P330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Nikon D800 Fujifilm X-E1 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +7 more
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow