X-E1 vs X-A1 raws with 14/2.8

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
bonesmalones
New MemberPosts: 5
Like?
Re: X-E1 vs X-A1 raws with 14/2.8
In reply to Beat Traveller, 9 months ago

Beat Traveller wrote:

DonSantos wrote:

Two years of endless discussion about the shortcomings of the X-trans sensor, and this is the final proof? A few slightly mushier background trees?

If anyone seriously is going to use that as an excuse to go back to a Bayer sensor, then I pay my respects, as you're clearly a much greater pixel-peeper than I.

You can continue paying the 200$ premium for a sensor without any gains

Actually the reason I bought an X-E1 was primarily for the control scheme, which I wouldn't trade away. Yes, the X-trans doesn't give any major advantage over Bayer but neither is it as awful as frequently made out to be.

Yeah I don't get the constant effort to bash the X-Trans. The old "my stuff is better than your stuff"? I love the images from my X-M1. Remember, the plural of anecdote is NOT data.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow