Why Thom is wrong...

Started Sep 25, 2013 | Discussions thread
Richard
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,764
Like?
The future's so bright .. I gotta wear shades..
In reply to MarkJH, Sep 25, 2013

MarkJH wrote:

Seems like a reasonable look at one possible future to me, Richard. That said, after pondering the logic as you'd suggested, I had a few thoughts.

Richard wrote:

And Mirrorless is dead. Now before you go getting emotional, ponder the logic.

1.DSLRs act like mirrorless as they are right now. They push the mirror out of the way when they go into live view. The first objection is that the AF is faster on mirrorless, sure using on sensor AF on a DSLR. Right now that is true but if you think Canonikon is going to sit on the hands and not improve live view to the point it is better than current mirrorless, I think they are smarter than that. It will happen or Canonikon will die. Mirrorless will lose the AF advantage in live view.

I'm missing the evidence for your CaNikon confidence, here. It's true that both companies are clearly putting r&d into better on-sensor focus systems, but neither is yet coming away with a clear victory.

The Nikon V1 has a very fast on sensor AF system.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/NIKONV1/NIKONV1A6.HTM

They have the ability to put it on sensor, it is only a matter of time it will be on a DSLR sensor, the tech is already there at lease for Nikon

The Canon 70D's "dual-pixel" phase sensor, as a case in point, really does dramatically improve live-view performance, but it's still not as fast or as confident as Olympus's contast-detection for stills. And, in time Canon took to develop it, Olympus cooked some improvements into their system such that the new EM-1 now offers true phase-detect continuous performance.

Oly was there before Canon, Canon will improve, if they don't they will die but realize that Canon and Nikon are financially in much better shape to improve than Oly.

So, it looks (to me, anyway) like all the parties are inching forward, and the relative advantages among them haven't decisively changed. Olympus is still the fastest single-shot AF in town. I guess we'll have to see things like EM-1 vs. 70D continuous video AF results to really judge more.

Of all the players, it seems at the moment that Nikon is really lagging in this area. But maybe they've got something in the works that we don't know about?

2. Canikon already have EVF, on the back of the camera for live view. They also can use a laptop, tablet or smart phone as a remote. They have had this for some time. Mirrorless has no advantage there.

Well, except that Olympus cooked a remote wi-fi implementation into the OM-1, and most Nikon DSLRs require an extra off-camera dongle to do similar stuff.

To add a usb wifi to any device it easy and cheap. I think we will see it more on Canikon in the future.

3. Canikon can make smaller dslrs with APS-C that will be able to compete with mirrorless or they can produce better EOSM and V1 units. Again, they cover Pro, Advanced amateur, beginner, small size DSLRs. (they both produce point and shoots too.)

The new tiny EOS SL1 definitely gives mirrorless cameras like the OM-D and GH series a run on size, but the OM-D and GH cameras are so much better specified. The SL1 uses the ancient 18 megapixel sensor, doesn't have an articulated screen, doesn't offer AF fine-tune (so that wide-aperture shooting is gonna be tough). I can't imagine anyone choosing an SL1 over a GH3, for example, for video.

SL1 costs 699 at with lens right now at b&h, the OMD is 1299. I would hope the OMd is a better camera. The SL1 only shows what is possible, give it a price tag off 1299 and see what they put inside of it.

And the Nikon 1 cameras really do silo you into their sensor size: you have to be cool with limited shallow DoF options to like them, though certainly there's plenty of great photography for which that'd be OK.

It is not about sensor size, it is about quick AF on sensor.

I guess what I am saying here, again, is that I see valid CaNikon competition, but I don't any real advantages, andi don't see any real evidence that any are coming. As with your other two points, it seems like they've left a door or two open for competitors to exploit, and competitors have.

SL1 Size, V1 AF on sensor for speed. They are moving right along

At this point mirrorless has no advantage and has disadvantages compared to Canikon solutions.

Well, I can think of a few. Micro 4/3 has a wonderful lens system right now, with exceptional primes. CaNikon do, too, but only for FX and at a serious cost premium.

But all FX lenses fit on Canons APSc cameras so there is a huge number of lenses for canon or nikon

Well, the rumor mill tells us we will have a full-frame Sony NEX mirrorless in a few days, so there's the end of that CaNikon exclusive.

But will it be a pro camera? That is the Canikon exlusive.

I think most camera people know these points already and if they are honest with themselves, they already know mirrorless in its present form is not where it is at.

Being honest with myself, I find the latest round of mirrorless products to be well-specified, capable, and pretty desireable. I don't know that I would want one for photographing sports or events, but for fine art, portraits, fashion, I think they might actually be the better tool at the moment for many different styles.

When I am honest with myself, I see myself shooting APS-C or FF for all the things you mentioned above but for anything portable, pocketable I would carry a smart phone, or for pocketable, something like a an Sony RX100

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow