Warming whoops: Scientists debate the falling rate of rising temperatures

Started Sep 18, 2013 | Discussions thread
kcbeatty
Senior MemberPosts: 1,761
Like?
Re: Warming whoops: Scientists debate the falling rate of rising temperatures
In reply to 95_9C1, Sep 18, 2013

95_9C1 wrote:

kcbeatty wrote:

The world has warmed 0.05 degrees Celsius (0.09 degrees Fahrenheit) per decade over the past 15 years, a fraction of the 0.2ºC (0.36ºF) per decade rate confidently predicted by the U.N. six years ago, according to a leaked copy of the foremost climate report in the world.

“The rate of warming over the past 15 years (0.05°C per decade) is smaller than the trend since 1951 (0.12°C per decade),” the draft report states.

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/09/17/is-global-warming-actually-far-lower-than-scientists-predicted

That’s the upshot of a new study in the journal Nature Climate Change

that compared 117 climate predictions made in the 1990's to the actual amount of warming. Out of 117 predictions, the study’s author told FoxNews.com, three were roughly accurate and 114 overestimated the amount of warming. On average, the predictions forecasted two times more global warming than actually occurred.

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/09/12/climate-models-wildly-overestimated-global-warming-study-finds/?intcmp=related

Also there's this:

About a million more square miles of ocean are covered in ice in 2013 than in 2012, a whopping 60 percent increase -- and a dramatic deviation from predictions of an "ice-free Arctic in 2013,"

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/09/09/arctic-sea-ice-up-60-percent-in-2013/?intcmp=related

The UN will officially release the full report soon. Some how this information was leaked out ahead of the report. They are scrambling to try and rewrite the reports to make them not as damaging to the AGW predictions.

-- hide signature --

Kevin

the zealots will attack your sources ...

AGW is their Jesus

-- hide signature --

nothing to see here, folks, keep movin' ...

You are probably right, even though Fox simply reported data from reliable sources.  It's getting harder for the AGW crowd to come up with explanations for the data that debunks their predictions.  And it is like I thought, they are using computer software to analyze the conditions and make predictions based on models created by the Scientists.  Like always with computers it's " garbage in garbage out".

-- hide signature --

Kevin

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow