An anti-EM1 Thread - Here's why

Started Sep 17, 2013 | Discussions thread
Forum ProPosts: 11,039Gear list
Re: Eyes on image quality
In reply to Anfy, Sep 17, 2013

Anfy wrote:

Corpy2 wrote:

1) The image quality, despite a few hyperventilating reviews, is a little bit better. You hear that? A little bit better. It's not a lot better.

What buzzes me is this matter of image quality. I really want the new camera be better than the other m4/3s, since everyone wins to have a professional tool choice in the lineup with top IQ: but I simply fail to see the significant improvement others report, at practical speeds; I do not care much about ISO 12,800 and 25,600 results since for a serious work at those speeds - if ever possible - I would borrow a full frame camera anyway, most likely a dSLR.

So, since I believe that professional reviewers have better knowledge than me, it must be my monitor (or - I hope not! - my eyes).


-- hide signature --

Viva la evolución!

Agreed, have seen no comparisons that the IQ of the EM1 is better than EM5…HERE's the issue…Focus Peaking and Spot AF…the EM5 desperately needs these two enhancements...

EM5 cannot do the following as the AF Box is too large and no Focus Peaking...

EP5 with Focus Peaking and Spot AF:

-- hide signature --

--Really there is a God...and He loves you..
FlickR Photostream:
Mr Ichiro Kitao, I support the call to upgrade the FZ50.
I will not only buy one but two no questions asked...

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow