Is the Nikon 16-35 f4 significantly better than the 18-105 for a DX

Started 10 months ago | Questions thread
romfordbluenose
Contributing MemberPosts: 659Gear list
Like?
Re: No, 16-35 doesn't make sense on DX. Get Nikon 10-24 DX for landscapes.
In reply to jbagg, 10 months ago

I used a Sigma 10-20 before I moved to the D800. Good enough for me and only sold it because I changed cameras.

 romfordbluenose's gear list:romfordbluenose's gear list
Nikon D800 Nikon AF Nikkor 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5D IF ED Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED VR +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow