The F2.8 choice, 12-40mm vs 12-35mm

Started Sep 9, 2013 | Discussions thread
drj3
Senior MemberPosts: 1,490Gear list
Like?
Re: Two reasons why I'll probably buy the 12-35mm
In reply to bluelemmy, Sep 9, 2013

bluelemmy wrote:

> whereas the 12-35 takes a 58mm filter.

As do the 35-100 f2.8 and the 14-140mm f3.5-5.6. A very professional move on the part of Panasonic.

-- hide signature --

David
www.dthorpe.net

The longer focal length range of the Olympus design of the 12-40 obviously required a larger front element in order to allow enough light into the lens to maintain the 2.8 aperture and the same will probably be true of the new 40-150mm 2.8.  The Olympus FT 12-60mm 2.8-40 requires a 72mm filter and the 50-200mm 2.8-3.5 requires a 67mm filter.  I am certain that if Olympus wanted to offer a 12-35mm lens they could have used a 58mm filter.  It has nothing to do with being professional.  Panasonic chose a more limited zoom range design which allowed them to use a smaller front element for the lens.  I would personally prefer a longer focal length lens with a constant aperture and then buy another filter for those occasions where it was needed, than to give up the difference between 35 & 40mm in order to save a few dollars on filters.  I personally hope that Olympus never designs a lens based on maintaining a specific filter size, but rather designs lenses for best quality for the specific focal length and maximum aperture.

-- hide signature --

drj3

 drj3's gear list:drj3's gear list
Olympus E-510 Olympus E-5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 12-60mm 1:2.8-4.0 SWD +5 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow