Film Vs Digital (not the usual question)

Started Sep 4, 2013 | Discussions thread
Erik Ohlson
Forum ProPosts: 13,796
Like?
Re: My Recollections
In reply to Henry Falkner, Sep 6, 2013

With this one exception [Henry Falkner, above] it's absolutely hilarious the ideas posted here purporting to understand film processing at all.

As to PP - just try to think of spotting little tiny dust spots (usually squiggly lines) with a 2 or 3 haired brush & ink - no room for error even working under a 10 Power magnifier - and no "Undo!"

And EVERY print had to be done individually - no multiple copies from the same PP, producing a bunch of "identical" prints was a real hassle.

Probably just as well, since Digital is FAR superior to film.

Don't miss that at all. So glad film is no longer needed!

-- hide signature --

"Measure wealth not by things you have but by things for which you would not take money"
www.flickr.com/ohlsonmh/ ohlsonmh@yahoo.com

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow