What a disappointing situation with the 17mm lens! Why?

Started 11 months ago | Discussions thread
tinternaut
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,509Gear list
Like?
Re: I fully agree on that bit of 12/17 comparison.
In reply to Sergey Borachev, 11 months ago

Sergey Borachev wrote:

I am no expert and I hope someone can confirm this.

My understanding is that FL around 50mm is the easiest to make good.

I think the rule of what a normal lens is, from the perspective of ease of design, is based in ten register distance between lens and film. For 35mm, this happened to be around 50mm, so 50mm or longer was easy to design. I'm not sure how this pans out for Micro Four Thirds.  Certainly, in terms of reaching perfection, Olympus has done better at longer focal lengths for its primes, whereas its wider lenses seem to have inherent compromises.

However, I still contend that the ultimate measure of a lens is in the image it produces.  In this respect, even the 17mm f2.8 pancake is capable enough, if you are aware of its limitations.

-- hide signature --
 tinternaut's gear list:tinternaut's gear list
Olympus E-510 Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 Olympus E-30 Olympus PEN E-PL1 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm 1:4.0-5.6 +7 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow