What a disappointing situation with the 17mm lens! Why?

Started Sep 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
Senior MemberPosts: 3,112Gear list
Re: OK, bar user experience, look just at numbers.
In reply to Paul De Bra, Sep 2, 2013

Paul De Bra wrote:

There is no denying that the 17mm lens is not quite as good optically as the 20mm.

Yes, and as I have stated elsewhere, the 17mm is larger and (on average) more expensive than the 20mm, while, at the same time, not as good optically.

This is why I (and many others) consider the 17mm to be an under performer. It performs less well, optically, than a competing lens which is smaller and can be, on average, had for less money. These are the facts.

 texinwien's gear list:texinwien's gear list
Canon EOS 300D Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 Olympus E-M5 II Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +17 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow