M43 seems more and more overpriced compared to NEX

Started Aug 27, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
tomtom50 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,244
Re: M43 seems more and more overpriced compared to NEX

mpgxsvcd wrote:

The only company that doesn't compete very well right now is Canon.

The EOS-m fire sale continues. An Eos-m with kit lens is $345, and that lens is sharper than NEX kits by a good margin. Further the 22mm f2 pancake is very sharp and can be bought new on ebay (from broken up kits) for $130.

Canon doesn't compete in that they are dumping product at a loss, but the Eos-m is very competitive right now.

The Eos-m focus is improved (new firmware) to the point where it is the same as my NEX-3n. I like both cameras in their own way, and focus speed is not what differentiates the two.

Unbeatable value

 tomtom50's gear list:tomtom50's gear list
Sony RX100 Canon EOS M Sony Alpha NEX-3N Sony a6000
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow