M43 seems more and more overpriced compared to NEX

Started Aug 27, 2013 | Discussions thread
peevee1
Senior MemberPosts: 5,443Gear list
Like?
Re: M43 seems more and more overpriced compared to NEX
In reply to captura, Aug 31, 2013

captura wrote:

LTZ470 wrote:

None of the Sony lens are in the same class as the m43 12-35, 35-100, 100-300, 75mm f/1.8, 12mm f/2 for size, quality and weight...I own the Nex-7 and several E-Mount lens, they reek of the cheap seats for sure, even the Nex-7 compared to Em-5, it just doesn't have it compared to EM5, great camera but m43's camera quality and build are a step above...

Shot the EM5 in the rain all day one day...you ain't gonna do that with a Nex...or you'll need a "nex"...next camera...

-- hide signature --

--Really there is a God...and He loves you..
FlickR Photostream:
www.flickr.com/photos/46756347@N08/
Mr Ichiro Kitao, I support the call to upgrade the FZ50.
I will not only buy one but two no questions asked...

The coming NEX-7x is said to be dustproofed..I suppose that means weatherproofed.

Without weatherproof lenses it is useless. And both expensive zooms just announced are not weatherproof.

Some of the many lenses for E-mount NEX are excellent, and a few are good values.

Especially (both):

- E50 f1.8

- E35 f1.8

- Zeiss E16-70Z

How do you know it is excellent, any tests? Expensive for sure.

- Sigma 19 f2.8

- Sigma 30 f30

- Sigma 60 f60

Boring slow primes.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow