M43 seems more and more overpriced compared to NEX

Started Aug 27, 2013 | Discussions thread
captura
Forum ProPosts: 13,983Gear list
Like?
Re: M43 seems more and more overpriced compared to NEX
In reply to jennajenna, Aug 30, 2013

jennajenna wrote:

Frugaltraveler wrote:

tgutgu wrote:

Overpriced? What a nonsense. Look at the A3000. It is horribly stripped down: no separate dial, poor NEX style controls, low resolution screen, slow frame rate. This camera is so stripped down, that it is not even worth its low price. I would rather spend a few more and get a better m4/3 camera for it. Even the lowest end m4/3 is a lot better than the A3000 and has a better value for money.

-- hide signature --

Thomas

or buy a NEX 7 for the same price as a OM-D? NEX woud be a better choice now if I didn't already have so many mu43 lenses.

does nex7 have ibis? i dont follow sony since the whole beta tape fiasco on their part...and then the minidisc disaster.

3-axis IBIS from Olympus said to be a new feature in the 7x.

The A3000 has shown some outstanding quality images in sample shots taken with both the new 16-70 E-Zeiss lens and the 18-55 kit lens. That's all that counts....it's in the sensor, Virginia!

 captura's gear list:captura's gear list
Fujifilm X10 Sony Alpha NEX-7 Samsung NX1000 NEX5R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R +10 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow