why has the 16mm f2.8 got such a bad rep?

Started Jul 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
tomtom50
Senior MemberPosts: 2,632Gear list
Like?
Re: Part of it is... the language from reviewers...
In reply to boardsy, Jul 30, 2013

boardsy wrote

Good catch! People seem to love bashing this lens, which even in their tests shows reasonably good central sharpness, despite the corner fall-off (as much due to field curvature as anything - did making a 16mm so small require the very convex front element which might cause that?).

It isn't field curvature on my lens. Those corners cannot be made sharp even if I focus on them.

Check the MTF chart. This lens, by design, has very soft corners.

I would be fine if Sony sold it with verbiage explaining it is a special use lens:

This lens is optimized for compactness and low price. The corners are not up to general Sony performance standards, especially at apertures wider then f8.

 tomtom50's gear list:tomtom50's gear list
Sony RX100 Canon EOS M Olympus PEN E-PM2 Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow