Why mirrorless over dslr?

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
PerL
Forum ProPosts: 12,237
Like?
Re: DSLRs for performance
In reply to Martin.au, 9 months ago

Mjankor wrote:

PerL wrote:

Ubilam wrote:

Or, vice versa? Please educate me. State the benefits/cons of both ONLY if you have used both types to compare. Thanks!

-- hide signature --

"Hey, don't blame me."

If you shoot action/sports, fast movings subjects/news, anything that demands the best for catching the moment, the EVFs and AF of the mirrorless simply does not cut it.

The EVFs cant keep up with fast sustained shooting, the AF on moving subjects is lacking (except for for Sony SLT-series which uses PDAF), the limited DR is disturbing in high contrast scenes, you get motion blur in the viewfinder, etc.

But I agree on the size matter. Todays DSLRS are on the big/heavy side. Ideally I would like FF DSLRs the size of of the classics SLRs, like Nikon FM/FE, Olympus OM, etc

-- hide signature --

Well damn. I guess I'd better stop doing that. Thanks for letting me know.

Well, if shooting action/sports is an important part of your shooting, you are simply not using the best tools if you are using mirrorless.

-- hide signature --
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
EasyNew
+1New
SizeNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow