Why mirrorless over dslr?

Started Jul 14, 2013 | Discussions thread
Martin.au
Senior MemberPosts: 5,914
Like?
Re: DSLRs for performance
In reply to PerL, Jul 14, 2013

PerL wrote:

Ubilam wrote:

Or, vice versa? Please educate me. State the benefits/cons of both ONLY if you have used both types to compare. Thanks!

-- hide signature --

"Hey, don't blame me."

If you shoot action/sports, fast movings subjects/news, anything that demands the best for catching the moment, the EVFs and AF of the mirrorless simply does not cut it.

The EVFs cant keep up with fast sustained shooting, the AF on moving subjects is lacking (except for for Sony SLT-series which uses PDAF), the limited DR is disturbing in high contrast scenes, you get motion blur in the viewfinder, etc.

But I agree on the size matter. Todays DSLRS are on the big/heavy side. Ideally I would like FF DSLRs the size of of the classics SLRs, like Nikon FM/FE, Olympus OM, etc

-- hide signature --

Well damn. I guess I'd better stop doing that. Thanks for letting me know.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
EasyNew
+1New
SizeNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow