Would you consider the 70D to be

Started Jul 7, 2013 | Discussions thread
Karl Gnter Wnsch
Forum ProPosts: 10,059Gear list
Like?
Re: No.
In reply to T3, Jul 8, 2013

T3 wrote:

Midwest wrote:

70D <> 7D

continuous 7fps <> 8fps

Probably not a difference most people will ever notice.

That still doesn't make the speed any better, the 70D is worse in this respect.

buffer 16 RAW - 60 JPG <> 25 RAW 130 JPG

Again, not a difference most people will ever notice. 16 consecutive frames is a lot for most people.

If you happen to shoot short sequences while for example a F1 car passes by you will notice that difference really fast because even though you don't shoot 25 shots consecutively you will hit the buffer limit at some time. The slower SD card interface doesn't help either as then the buffer is freed less quickly.

I also like the fact that plastics are lighter. No point in lugging around more weight than you have to.

Well if the body happens to be too small to offer all the necessary controls (as is the case on the 70D) then this "lighter/smaller is better" is a misconception. Put a good fast lens on the camera and the plastic bodied camera will feel unbalanced. You need the weight for a well balanced setup.

-- hide signature --

regards
Karl Günter Wünsch

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
NoNew
NoNew
NoNew
No.New
yesNew
No!New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow