SLRGear: 80-400mm review

Started Jul 4, 2013 | Discussions thread
Photo Pete
Senior MemberPosts: 1,863
Like?
Re: Maybe yes - maybe no
In reply to SHood, Jul 5, 2013

The 1/focal length 'rule' was more to do with the amount of blur that was visible on a standard sized print from normal viewing distances, but it is true that 10 or 12 mp cameras tended to mask camera shake even when viewed much closer than that on screen.

The 'rules' for safe shutter speed and depth of field both go out of the window when pixel peeping and it is certainly a good reflection on current VR and AF systems that we can get anything resembling a sharp image when viewed at those magnifications.

It has never been more true that a genuinely sharp image is better achieved by removing camera shake than by compensating for it. What a shame Nikon didn't seem to understand that when they designed the 80-400 with such a flimsy tripod foot.
--
Have Fun
Photo Pete

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow