Police out of control or were they justified?

Started Jul 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
Brian D. Schneider
Forum ProPosts: 15,549
Like?
Re: Really?
In reply to Johnsonj, Jul 3, 2013

Johnsonj wrote:

Chato wrote:

Slider44 wrote:

drh681 wrote:

Slider44 wrote:

angrywhtman wrote:

My two cents on this....

The dog didn't deserve being shot. I didn't see it bite anyone?

You didn't see it bite anyone, or you fail to acknowledge it bite the officer and attacked.

The pedestrian should have not been aprehended for photographing the police assuming this is benign an not something else going on that we viewers don't know.

The pedestrian is an azzhole for taunting the police

Yes, the pedestrian created this whole situation, and his dog attacked. The police did not attack the dog, the dog attacked them.

All around this was mishandled by the police and the pedestrian and the dog paid the price.

Seriously? What did you expect the police to do? Let this man taunt them by video taping them, and then having his dog attack? Do you know the laws on dogs? This dog was clearly not confined or secured? If a dog escapes and attacks, then you are free to defend under any circumstances, including deadly force if necessary.

Uh the "suspect" had put the dog in his car. The dog left the car to go to the "suspect".

Uh, the dog CLEARLY was able to escape and attack. That does not mean the dog was secured, especially since the window was OPEN.

If you are walking down a street, and a pit bull is chained up in the owners back yard, and gets loose, and attacks and kills. That homeowner is going to end up filing bankruptcy, because they are going to be owned.

In this situation, the pedestrian was looking to cause trouble, and when he got what he wanted, he paid dearly for it. Not only was he arrested, but his dog was killed because it escaped the car, and attacked.

End of story.

Documenting the acitvities of the police is perfectly legal. The City, if not the Police are "going to pay dearly" for this.

That's right, fvkcface. And it's also perfectly legal for them to put the fvkc in cuffs and question him.

For recording from a safe distance? No fking way is that legal.

That's why many photographers have won big settlements.

Personally, I think they should put you in cuffs and question you every day you leave your rats nest.

Dave

-- hide signature --

"Everyone who has ever lived, has lived in Modern Times"

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow