Sunny 16 rule ... not optimal at 16?

Started Jul 1, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Senior MemberPosts: 1,752
Re: Sunny 16 rule ... not optimal at 16?
In reply to SQLGuy, Jul 2, 2013

The reason why the sunny 16 rule fails is its narrow interpretation: any exposure that is equivalent to 1/ISO sec and f.16 aperture in bright sunlight, will give the same exposure as the rule demands.

But f/16 is useful for tele lenses maybe, but then 1/100 sec is too long to stop camera shake blurr, so for tele shots it would be better to use higher ISo, say 200, f/11 and 1/400 sec for an equivalent exposure to the slavish f/16 at 1/100 sec rule at ISO 100.

And for a wide ankle lens there is no sense to go to f/16; f/5.6 or f/8 will give wide DOF, so at ISO 100, the exposure time in full sun should better be 'equivalent' to the simplest sunny rule at around 1/400 sec in case of using f/8.

A simple understanding of equivalent exposures is definitely needed here: one f stop smaller (less light, larger denominator) needs to be balanced by doubling the exposure time (longer exposure) and vice versa, of course.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow