Still Trying to Convince Myself on RAW

Started Jun 29, 2013 | Photos thread
cgarrard
Forum ProPosts: 14,499Gear list
Like?
Raw reveals its value over time
In reply to Gary Eickmeier, Jun 30, 2013

Gary Eickmeier wrote:

I suppose we all do this comparison stuff between RAW and JPG to try and convince ourselves of the vast superiority of RAW, but I am still a work in progress. Shot a band camp recital in RAW and JPG. Shot from 1600 to 6400 jut to stretch the limits. Opened up the RAW images, a little shocked at the noise at 6400. Opened up the JPG image, AMAZED at the smoothness and perfection of the image. At 1600 there is not much difference, would say no problem whatsoever up to 1600.

So a couple of comparisons, proessed and not:

You can view them in original by clicking through. Maybe you have an example where RAW shows its superiorty. So far I haven't seen it.

I am not fighting it, still trying to learn. Bought another book on it by Jon Canfield. What I need to learn is how to process the RAW to get them to begin to compare with the camera's internal processing.

-- hide signature --

Gary Eickmeier

It can be instantly gratifying, but not usually. I find that I re-process many older (but good) images from years back in raw only to see just how much I've improved in my post processing since I made the original image.  Raw is the negative you should never throw away, storage is wayyyy too cheap these days to justify doing that.

Carl

http://www.carlgarrard.blogspot.com/ (Best work compilation)
http://www.photographic-central.blogspot.com (Gear reviews)
Also formerly AlphaMountWorld.com (Now off the web)

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
+1New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow