About moderation - Feedback

Started Jun 24, 2013 | Discussions thread
AllMankind
Contributing MemberPosts: 564
Like?
Re: About moderation - Feedback
In reply to lenshoarder, Jun 27, 2013

lenshoarder wrote:

Here's a couple of reasons. 1) Just having that "mod" symbol next to their name changes everything There's a concept of acting under the color of authority. 2) I have seen threads where the mod makes the last point and then declares the thread closed. 3) As you've said, they are volunteers. If they don't want to do it, then don't do it. It's a priviledge, not a burden.

I agree completely.  We are on the same page.

My suggestion that mods only moderate forums they don't participate in solves these problems. They can participate in the forums they are passionate about. They can moderate in the forums they are inpartial about. What's the problem with that?

Perhaps it is just too logical for DPR to grasp.

DPR does not seem to understand what 'Conflict of Interest' means.

-- hide signature --

Oppose Tyranny in all its forms.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
trueNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow