Canon 200-400 f/4 reviewed by "Chasseur d'Images"

Started Jun 20, 2013 | Discussions thread
olsem007
Forum MemberPosts: 93
Like?
Re: Canon 200-400 f/4 reviewed by "Chasseur d'Images"
In reply to qianp2k, Jun 25, 2013

qianp2k wrote:

Oldvic wrote:

Thanks for quote. Just want to be clear that in above sentence - external 1.4x TC is better or worse than internal 1.4x TC? It doesn’t make sense if external TC actually is better.

That's what I can conclude from the graphs: at f/32, the external converter gives better results than the internal one; at other apertures, there's no difference.

Really? Wow. That's why people call the built-in 1.4x TC is the world most expensive TC ever So that convinience costs somewhat $4K?

Cheers

__________________________________________________________________________

Well, when they ordered me, my parents might have chosen a larger print size…

-- hide signature --

$4K? A little more.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-200-400mm-USM-Extender-1-4x/dp/B00CQGF8H6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1372129208&sr=8-1&keywords=canon+200-400mm

-- hide signature --

Most lenses and cameras are better than most photographers...

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow