Samsung gets it right - look here, Oly!

Started Jun 18, 2013 | Discussions thread
NZ Scott
Senior MemberPosts: 3,512Gear list
Like?
Re: Oh the irony!
In reply to g_r_w, Jun 21, 2013

g_r_w wrote:

NZ Scott wrote:

Hey kids,

After the disappointment with the E-M5 and E-P5 I started to wonder if Olympus would ever design a camera with decent ergonomics. Hopefully Oly will take a look at Samsung's new Galaxy NX mirrorless camera, which has nailed some of the layout features the E-M5 should have had, namely:

.....

The main problem with the Samsung is that it lacks room for physical controls. However, that's because it has an enormous 4.3 inch display. Knock that puppy down to 3 inches, add some dials and buttons, and Bob's your uncle.

Isn't it a little ironic to praise the ergonomic qualities of a camera that basically has no physical buttons?

Go back and read the original post.

I CRITICISED the Samsung for not having physical buttons.

Honestly, I wonder if some of the people frequenting this forum are even able to read.

S

It is on record that you have little love for the E-M5, but calling out Olympus for the perceived deficiencies on the E-M5 based on what you've seen of this camera is a little amusing.

You've stated that your desirable camera would include buttons, but that's not what Samsung have done is it? As far as I'm concerned haptics and ergonomics go hand-in-hand - no pun intended. So where's the thread "Samsung gets it wrong - don'y look here, Oly!"

This is what you think they did right:

- EVF placed on the left

Frankly it makes no difference to me, but I can understand that it is important to others.

- Built-in flash

This has nothing to do with ergonomics. It is a feature. I agree it is nice to have, but its relative value differs between users. I've been to a couple of the press and launch events now and I always ask the evangelist - "So, you've had the camera for X weeks, how many times did you use the internal flash?" The answers so far have been invariably - never, not once.

- Deep grip with (presumably) a large battery inside while retaining a slim body

I agree that this is generally a staple of good ergonomics. I've got no problem with the E-M5's standard grip and the good, although, not free option is to buy the additional grip. As you mentioned the EP-5 cannot have the grip changed because the Wi-Fi antenna is embedded in it. Guessing some inventive person could think of something, but it is not available out of the box.

The biggest gripe I've heard about the E-M5 (apart from the hump) is it's tiny buttons. Congratulations Samsung, you completely got around that by having no buttons.

The EP-5 actually manages to get more controls at your finger tips with the 2 x 2 controls.

On the Samsung you basically can't change any settings without taking your eye away from the EVF. Do two rights make up for a big fat wrong?

-- hide signature --
 NZ Scott's gear list:NZ Scott's gear list
Sony QX1 Olympus PEN E-P3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G II Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH +12 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Ugh!New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow