Canon 200-400 f/4 reviewed by "Chasseur d'Images"

Started Jun 20, 2013 | Discussions thread
qianp2k
Senior MemberPosts: 9,809Gear list
Like?
Re: Canon 200-400 f/4 reviewed by "Chasseur d'Images"
In reply to Oldvic, Jun 20, 2013

Oldvic wrote:

Thanks for quote. Just want to be clear that in above sentence - external 1.4x TC is better or worse than internal 1.4x TC? It doesn’t make sense if external TC actually is better.

That's what I can conclude from the graphs: at f/32, the external converter gives better results than the internal one; at other apertures, there's no difference.

Really? Wow. That's why people call the built-in 1.4x TC is the world most expensive TC ever   So that convinience costs somewhat $4K?

Cheers

__________________________________________________________________________

Well, when they ordered me, my parents might have chosen a larger print size…

-- hide signature --
 qianp2k's gear list:qianp2k's gear list
Sony RX100 Canon EOS-1D Mark III Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 5D Mark III Sony Alpha 7R +20 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow