"Bokeh" overrated? I think so!

Started Jun 18, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
M. Mitchell Regular Member • Posts: 307
Re: "Bokeh" overrated? I think so!

I completely agree with you. When I look at at photograph, I like to look at every detail. I hate to see a blur. Why include a blurred area in a photo if you don't want the viewer to see what it is? Notice that few painters will blur a background or foreground. I can understand the use of blurred areas for posters or advertising photos where the photographer tries to attract your eye to one subject. But if a background is included in a photo, it should have a purpose.  For example, it should show context. Otherwise it is a waste of space.

This, of course is a subject that has been considered and discussed since the invention of photography, most notably by a famous group of early photographers who formed what they called the f/64 club.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
tko
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
eNo
(unknown member)
eNo
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow