X100s really disappointing image. Is this normal?

Started Jun 13, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Les Lammers
Les Lammers Veteran Member • Posts: 3,007
Re: what are you talking about

digicosmos wrote:

Thank you! So it's confirmed that the JPG engines of X-trans cameras is just not as good as that of X100. I thought X100s would keep even a higher standard. In other words, my expectations were too high.

Actually I had no problem with X-Pro 1 or X-E1 in terms of JPG quality but I'll start shooting RAW again without feeling confident about the RAW converters. Fuji had better work on this with Adobe and other software producers.

It took a while for Adobe to get RAW right for the X-10...so be patient.

 Les Lammers's gear list:Les Lammers's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix X100 Fujifilm X10 Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm X-T10 Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R +5 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
chp
chp
chp
chp
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow