Is FF really better than m43? and why?

Started Jun 9, 2013 | Discussions thread
Tom2572
Contributing MemberPosts: 954
Like?
Re: Is FF really better than m43? and why?
In reply to MrFlash, Jun 10, 2013

MrFlash wrote:

Higher pixel density = Lower quality. It just does.

Not that manufactures can't make a high density sensor that delivers good results - they can and do, but if they take the same number of pixels and spread it across a larger area the results will have better color, lower noise and higher quality - every time.

-- hide signature --

MrFlash

+1

Physics don't care about popularity contests or soothing feelings of insecurity over camera purchases. Physics just is

I wonder if the OP realizes that if he took his hypothesis and thought it out further, he would eventually have to ask: "Is m43 really better than cell phones? and why?"

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
.New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow