Is FF really better than m43? and why?

Started Jun 9, 2013 | Discussions thread
Robgo2
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,595
Like?
Re: Is FF really better than m43? and why?
In reply to A2T2, Jun 10, 2013

To put the question of whether FF is better than m43 in proper context, you have to specify "better for what?"  In terms of greater resolution with less noise--yes.  Dynamic range--yes.  Control of DOF--yes.  Basic photography to be printed small or displayed on the web--probably no.

The OP posted a nice portrait that shows off the fine picture taking qualities of his E-M5, but I can guarantee that if he took the same picture with a FF Sony RX1, the difference would be so striking that anyone could see it.  So the question really boils down to whether m43 is good enough, not whether it is as good as FF.  That is something for each individual photographer to answer based on his or her own standards and needs.

Rob

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
.New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow