Is FF really better than m43? and why?

Started Jun 9, 2013 | Discussions thread
norland
Forum MemberPosts: 97
Like?
Re: Is FF really better than m43? and why?
In reply to MAubrey, Jun 10, 2013

MAubrey wrote:

A2T2 wrote:

FF in low light its a nightmare, unless you specifically want 1 eye in focus you have to ramp the aperture and hence the iso, FF is actually the opposite of what you want in low light.

Bump the ISO up by two stops and close your aperture by two stops and then its taken care of. A D600 has two stops better ISO than the E-M5...and if you downsize the images to the 16MP of the E-M5, then its even better. The one eye in focus issue is only a problem if you're shooting the eight year old 5Dc.

-- hide signature --

--Mike

So except at infinity, the FF's higher ISO capability is largely useless since it has to be diverted into compensating for FF's shallow depth of field.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
.New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow