Is FF really better than m43? and why?

Started Jun 9, 2013 | Discussions thread
Donald Chin
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,206Gear list
Like?
Re: Is FF really better than m43? and why?
In reply to DragosJianu, Jun 10, 2013

DragosJianu wrote:

A2T2 wrote:

Seriously no crusade but its nice to know that FF has zero advantage of m43!

Now you are just being remarkably childish.

As for the pic that started this thread, it looks fake. I would have less of a problem believing it was taken with an ultrazoom P&S rathern then a M43. Certainly not FF. It's not even making M43 justice. M43 can achieve far better subject separation, and without cheap Gaussian Blur tricks.

Yes, it indeed is a fake, the embed thumbnail show the original should look like this

But OP has a similar shot in his album which indicate that the original should had been taken with an E-M5 with 14-150mm F4-5.6 shot at 46 mm Aperture-priority AE, 1/200 sec, f/6.3, ISO 200

This one was taken with an E-M5 with 14-150mm F4-5.6 shot at 34 mm Aperture-priority AE, 1/1000 sec, f/6.3, ISO 200, EC-1

-- hide signature --
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
.New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow