Is FF really better than m43? and why?

Started Jun 9, 2013 | Discussions thread
Ridethelight
Regular MemberPosts: 195Gear list
Like?
Re: Is FF really better than m43? and why?
In reply to Ulric, Jun 9, 2013

I would feel very sad if this image was shot by me with my D700 and 85mm f1.8 combo .

Not sure what this pic is means,it is a old guy in red completly abstract from any story that the surroundings may imply to a viewer,therefore generating no interest or meaning .

The bokeh is harsh and ugly to the extreme,the foliage backgrond never helps with this.

Personally the image would of been destined for delete before it left the SD card.

Not sure what your crusade is to be honest,yes micro 4/3 is excellent for casual use esp with the superb primes,but if a wedding photographer turned up with m4/3 gear and assured me that i would not notice any difference,i would tell him to take a very long hike.

 Ridethelight's gear list:Ridethelight's gear list
Nikon D610 Nikon AF Nikkor 28mm f/2.8D Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D Nikon AF-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
.New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow