Mark iii comparable to Nikon d600?? Locked

Started Jun 2, 2013 | Questions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
This thread is locked.
The Davinator
The Davinator Forum Pro • Posts: 16,583
Re: Mark iii comparable to Nikon d600??

ktownbill wrote:

The Canon has a much better focusing system and half the shutter-lag of the Nikon.

If you were going to shoot landscapes I would suggest the Nikon over the Canon. (14 stops of DR)

I hear a lot of criticism of how the Nikons render skin-tones. For sure check that out.

I recently bought a 5Dm3 for outdoor portraiture. If I was doing studio portraiture my 7D would do just fine. No need for FF.

You are truly in a good position being that you are not invested in glass.

The comparison the other poster linked to is excellent.

Best of luck with your decision.

Bill

I agree with everything here....bang on.  Skintones are identical once each camera is profiled in raw.

 The Davinator's gear list:The Davinator's gear list
Canon PowerShot G3 Canon PowerShot SX150 IS Canon EOS D30 Canon EOS 10D Nikon D2X +18 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
fad
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow