Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 vs. Nikon 35mm f1.8

Started May 28, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
aspalmat Regular Member • Posts: 248
Re: Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 vs. Nikon 35mm f1.8
1

Fflum,

You will not be missing anything if you get the Sigma.  I have all 3 of the lenses you have or are thinking about.  I have the 18-200 VRII, the 35 f/1.8, and the Sigma 17-50 f/2.8, bought in that order. In my opinion, the Sigma is by far the best.

The 18-200 was my first lens, and I was really worried the 17 - 50 would not be "long" enough. However, the 17-50 range on DX seems to be excellent for general photography.  Plus, you get the constant f/2.8.

In my opinion, save, and get the Sigma.  Good luck whatever you decide.

 aspalmat's gear list:aspalmat's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Sony a6000 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Tamron SP 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di VC USD +4 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow