Why Canon made 1Dx best specification ... II

Started May 24, 2013 | Discussions thread
Great Bustard
Forum ProPosts: 24,681
Like?
Re: Weird...
In reply to qianp2k, May 26, 2013

qianp2k wrote:

Great Bustard wrote:

qianp2k wrote:

Now you shifted topic to per-picture level not per-pixel level

...that someone would be concerned with the appearance of the photo, not the appearance of individual pixels from photos captured on sensors with different pixel counts.

On their respective designed sizes not have to reduce sizes.  per-pixel = 100% cropped that I use interchangeably, that's what DPR reviews also used.

What I'm saying, Peter, is that we don't compare 1 pixel on a 5D3 to 1 pixel on a D800, but rather 22 pixels on a 5D3 to 36 pixels on a D800, if we want to compare in a photographically meaningful manner at the pixel level.

What was he thinking?

Now he is talking downsampling to 5D3 size

This, of course, eats away most of the resolution advantage of the D800, so I'm not sure why we would compare in this manner if we are talking about which system resolves more detail.

See you tomorrow.

Later.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
100New
fateNew
TrueNew
ThnxNew
OT:New
alsoNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow